International Data Transfers
Last Updated: January 7, 2025
This page provides detailed information about international (cross-border) transfers of personal data processed by Clients.ai (operated by KC Meta Ventures, Inc.). This information supplements our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and is provided to ensure transparency and compliance with data protection regulations including GDPR, UK GDPR, and PIPEDA.
As part of operating our AI-powered marketing platform, personal data may be transferred to, stored in, and processed in countries outside the European Economic Area (EEA), United Kingdom (UK), and your country of residence. This page explains where your data goes, the legal basis for these transfers, and the safeguards we implement to protect your data.
Legal Framework for International Transfers
International data transfers from the EEA/UK to third countries (countries without an EU adequacy decision) are permitted under GDPR only when appropriate safeguards are in place. We rely on the following legal mechanisms:
- EU Adequacy Decisions: Transfers to countries recognized by the European Commission as providing adequate data protection (e.g., Canada under PIPEDA for commercial organizations, Japan under APPI)
- Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs): EU Commission-approved contractual terms (Decision 2021/914) that impose data protection obligations on data importers in third countries
- UK International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA): UK Information Commissioner's Office-approved transfer agreement for UK personal data transfers post-Brexit
- Supplementary Measures: Additional technical and organizational safeguards (encryption, pseudonymization, access controls) implemented in accordance with EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 to address risks identified in Transfer Impact Assessments (TIAs)
- Transfer Impact Assessments (TIAs): Assessments conducted for transfers to countries without adequacy decisions (especially the United States post-Schrems II) to evaluate legal framework risks and ensure supplementary measures provide effective protection
Third Countries Receiving Personal Data
The table below lists all countries outside the EEA/UK to which Clients.ai transfers personal data, the legal basis for each transfer, the categories of data transferred, and the purpose of the transfer.
| Country | Transfer Basis | Data Categories | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada (Primary) | EU Adequacy Decision (2002/2/EC) PIPEDA-compliant commercial organizations | • All User Data (account details, profile information, usage data) • All Lead Data (contact information, interaction history) • Payment information (billing records, transaction history) • Support tickets and communications | Primary hosting and processing location KC Meta Ventures, Inc. (Canadian corporation) operates all core platform infrastructure, databases, and application servers from Canada |
| United States | SCCs (Module 2: Controller-to-Processor) + Supplementary Measures + Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA) Post-Schrems II compliance (no adequacy decision) | • Cloud infrastructure data (encrypted application data, database backups) • Pseudonymized data for AI model training and improvement • Anonymized usage analytics and performance metrics • Email communications metadata (via SendGrid) Note: Sensitive PII (full Lead Data contact details) stored exclusively in Canada; only pseudonymized/encrypted data sent to USA sub-processors | • AWS cloud hosting (infrastructure, compute, storage) • OpenAI API (AI model inference, content generation) • Stripe (payment processing - dual USA/Ireland) • SendGrid (transactional email delivery) • Analytics sub-processors (platform performance monitoring) |
| Australia | SCCs (Module 2) + Australian Privacy Act 1988 compliance | • Encrypted database backups • Support ticket archives • Billing records (disaster recovery copies) | Backup data center and disaster recovery Geographically distributed backup storage for business continuity (data encrypted at rest with keys held in Canada) |
| Japan | EU Adequacy Decision (2019/419) APPI-compliant entities | • Anonymized usage analytics • Static assets (images, scripts, stylesheets) No personal identifiers transferred | CDN edge servers (performance optimization) Content Delivery Network for faster page load times in Asia-Pacific region |
List current as of January 2025. This list is reviewed and updated quarterly or upon material changes to data processing locations or sub-processors. For real-time sub-processor updates, see clients.ai/legal/sub-processors.
Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) - Implementation Details
SCC Framework
- SCC Version: EU Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/914 of 4 June 2021 (post-Schrems II updated SCCs)
- Modules Applied:
- Module 2 (Controller-to-Processor): Applied for transfers from you (data controller) to Clients.ai (processor) and from Clients.ai to third-party sub-processors
- Module 3 (Processor-to-Processor): Applied via docking clause for sub-processor relationships where Clients.ai engages third-party processors in third countries
- Execution Date: SCCs executed with all third-country sub-processors as of September 1, 2021, and updated to Decision 2021/914 format by March 27, 2022 (transition deadline). Reviewed annually and upon onboarding new sub-processors.
- Optional Clauses Selected:
- Clause 7 (Docking Clause): Enabled - allows additional parties to join SCCs without requiring full re-execution
- Clause 9 (Option 2): General written authorization for sub-processors with 30-day objection period (see Terms of Service Section 17.6(4))
- Clause 11: Optional redress language omitted (standard Clause 11 remedies apply)
SCC Annex Details
Annex I: Parties and Transfer Details
- Data Exporter: You (User/Customer) acting as data controller
- Data Importer: KC Meta Ventures, Inc. (operating Clients.ai) and authorized sub-processors acting as processors
- Data Subjects: Your customers, leads, contacts, and end-users whose personal data you process using the Services
- Categories of Data: As specified in Privacy Policy Section 3 and this page (contact information, usage data, communications, payment data)
- Sensitive Data: None intentionally collected (Users prohibited from processing special category data under GDPR Article 9 via the Services)
- Processing Frequency: Continuous for duration of subscription
- Competent Supervisory Authority: Irish Data Protection Commission (lead supervisory authority for cross-border processing under GDPR one-stop-shop mechanism for EEA data subjects); for UK data subjects, UK Information Commissioner's Office
Annex II: Technical and Organizational Measures (TOMs)
Clients.ai implements the following security measures as detailed in our Security Policy:
- Encryption: AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit
- Access Controls: Role-based access controls (RBAC), principle of least privilege, multi-factor authentication (MFA) support
- Audit Logging: Comprehensive audit logs retained for 12 months minimum
- Security Certifications: SOC 2 Type II certified controls, ISO 27001 certification (in progress)
- Penetration Testing: Annual third-party penetration testing and vulnerability assessments
- Pseudonymization: PII pseudonymized where feasible for analytics and AI training
- Incident Response: Security incident response plan with 72-hour breach notification commitment (GDPR Article 33 alignment)
- Employee Training: Mandatory annual data protection and security training for all personnel with data access
Annex III: Sub-Processors
Current list of sub-processors with access to personal data transferred to third countries:
- Amazon Web Services (AWS) - USA - Cloud infrastructure, compute, storage
- OpenAI, Inc. - USA - AI model inference, content generation (pseudonymized data only)
- Stripe, Inc. - USA/Ireland - Payment processing (dual processing with EU entity Stripe Payments Europe, Ltd.)
- SendGrid (Twilio Inc.) - USA - Transactional email delivery
For complete sub-processor list including EEA-based processors, see clients.ai/legal/sub-processors.
SCC Governing Law and Jurisdiction
- Clause 17 (Governing Law): SCCs governed by the law of the EU Member State where you (data exporter) are established. For non-EU data exporters, Irish law applies as the fallback governing law.
- Clause 18 (Jurisdiction): Courts of the EU Member State where you are established have jurisdiction to resolve SCC disputes. For non-EU data exporters, courts of Ireland have exclusive jurisdiction.
- Third-Party Beneficiary Rights: Data subjects are third-party beneficiaries under Clauses 3, 11, and 18 and may enforce their rights directly against the data importer and/or data exporter.
Requesting Signed SCCs
Enterprise customers and users requiring signed Standard Contractual Clauses for compliance documentation (e.g., DPO review, procurement due diligence, supervisory authority requests) may request executed SCCs.
Email: legal@clients.ai with subject line "SCC Request - [Your Account Email]"
Response Time: Signed SCCs provided within 10 business days in PDF format with digital signatures
Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA) - United States Transfers
Schrems II Compliance Assessment
Following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgment in Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems (Case C-311/18, "Schrems II"), which invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield framework, Clients.ai conducted a comprehensive Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA) for personal data transfers to the United States.
TIA Conducted: January 2025 (reviewed annually and updated for material legal or technical changes)
Assessment Scope: Transfers to USA-based sub-processors (AWS, OpenAI, Stripe, SendGrid) - primary third country without EU adequacy decision
Step 1: Legal Framework Analysis (USA)
Assessment of U.S. surveillance laws and government access frameworks:
FISA Section 702 (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act)
- Risk: FISA Section 702 permits NSA and FBI to collect electronic communications of non-U.S. persons located outside the United States without individualized warrants (targeting "foreign intelligence information")
- Assessment: Clients.ai data unlikely to be of interest to U.S. intelligence agencies
- Data type: B2B SaaS usage data (LinkedIn automation, marketing analytics) - not communications content, not personal communications, not politically sensitive
- No evidence of FISA Section 702 bulk collection targeting similar B2B marketing SaaS platforms
- Our user base and data categories do not align with "foreign intelligence information" targeting criteria
- Conclusion: Risk assessed as LOW for FISA Section 702 targeting
Executive Order 12333
- Risk: Executive Order 12333 authorizes intelligence collection activities outside the United States with minimal court oversight; potential for incidental collection of data in transit
- Mitigation: End-to-end encryption (TLS 1.3 in transit, AES-256 at rest) reduces exploitability of any incidentally collected encrypted data
- Conclusion: Residual risk remains but encrypted data provides strong technical barrier to unauthorized access
CLOUD Act (Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act)
- Risk: CLOUD Act allows U.S. law enforcement to compel U.S.-based service providers to produce data stored anywhere in the world, subject to legal process (court orders, subpoenas)
- Assessment:
- Lawful legal process required (not warrantless bulk access)
- Clients.ai has received ZERO national security letters, FISA orders, or law enforcement data requests since launch (2022) - see Transparency Report
- AWS Transparency Report (2023) shows less than 0.01% of enterprise customers receive government legal demands annually
- Contractual Protections: SCCs require sub-processors to (a) immediately notify Clients.ai of government data requests (unless legally prohibited), (b) challenge overly broad or unlawful requests, and (c) provide transparency reporting
- Conclusion: CLOUD Act risk exists but assessed as LOW given data type, lack of access history, and contractual safeguards
Redress Mechanisms for Non-U.S. Persons
- Limitation Identified: Non-U.S. persons lack effective judicial redress for FISA Section 702 surveillance under U.S. law (no standing to challenge FISA orders in U.S. courts)
- GDPR Implication: Noted as a residual risk per EDPB Recommendations 01/2020; addressed through supplementary technical measures (see Step 3 below)
Step 2: Practical Access Assessment
- Nature of Data: LinkedIn automation and B2B sales/marketing use case data - NOT communications content, NOT personal communications, NOT politically sensitive, NOT national security-relevant
- Sub-Processor Jurisdictions: AWS (USA - us-east-1 Virginia, us-east-2 Ohio regions), OpenAI (USA - Azure backend), Stripe (dual USA/Ireland with EU entity), SendGrid (USA)
- Access History:
- Zero government access requests to Clients.ai since launch (2022)
- Zero national security letters or FISA orders received
- AWS Transparency Report indicates less than 0.01% of enterprise customers receive legal demands annually
- Business Context Risk Assessment: Niche B2B SaaS tool for marketing automation - outside typical national security or law enforcement targeting scope
- Overall Practical Risk Rating: LOW - combination of data type, business context, and lack of access history indicates minimal likelihood of government access requests
Step 3: Supplementary Measures Implemented
In accordance with EDPB Recommendations 01/2020, Clients.ai implements the following supplementary technical and organizational measures beyond Standard Contractual Clauses:
- Measure 1 - Encryption with Key Segregation:
- AES-256 encryption at rest for all data stored by USA sub-processors
- TLS 1.3 encryption in transit for all data transmissions
- Encryption keys managed exclusively in Canada using AWS KMS (Canada ca-central-1 region) - USA sub-processors cannot access plaintext data without key material held in adequate jurisdiction
- Effectiveness: Even if U.S. government compels disclosure of encrypted data from AWS, data is cryptographically unusable without Canadian-held decryption keys
- Measure 2 - Pseudonymization for AI Processing:
- User PII pseudonymized before transmission to USA-based AI training (OpenAI API)
- OpenAI receives only anonymized datasets with direct identifiers removed (no names, email addresses, or contact details)
- Pseudonymization mapping tables stored exclusively in Canada; re-identification possible only with Canadian database access
- Effectiveness: Reduces exploitability of any government access to AI training data - data not re-identifiable without Canadian infrastructure access
- Measure 3 - Data Minimization and Segmentation:
- Only operationally necessary data sent to USA sub-processors
- Lead Data contact details (email addresses, phone numbers, LinkedIn profiles) stored exclusively in Canada - NOT transferred to USA sub-processors
- AWS hosts encrypted application infrastructure but detailed user profiles and sensitive Lead Data remain in Canada-only database instances
- Effectiveness: Minimizes volume and sensitivity of data exposed to third-country legal frameworks
- Measure 4 - Enhanced Contractual Commitments:
- SCCs supplemented with additional clauses requiring sub-processors to: (a) immediately notify Clients.ai of government data requests (unless legally prohibited by gag order); (b) challenge overly broad, unlawful, or disproportionate requests; (c) provide annual transparency reporting; (d) submit to annual compliance attestations
- Effectiveness: Provides contractual enforcement mechanism and early warning system for government access attempts
- Measure 5 - Transparency Reporting:
- Annual Transparency Report published at clients.ai/transparency disclosing number and type of government requests received (if any)
- Warrant canary discontinued in 2024 (legal advice: ineffective post-gag orders and creates false sense of security)
- Effectiveness: Provides public accountability and visibility into government access requests
- Measure 6 - Regular TIA Review and Updates:
- TIA reviewed annually and upon material changes to: (a) third-country surveillance laws; (b) sub-processor locations or jurisdictions; (c) categories of data transferred; (d) security measures or encryption standards
- Effectiveness: Ensures ongoing compliance with evolving legal landscape and EDPB guidance
Step 4: Balancing Assessment and Conclusion
- Effectiveness of Supplementary Measures: ADEQUATE
- Encryption with Canadian-held keys + pseudonymization + data minimization combine to reduce exploitability of any government access to near-zero utility
- Even if U.S. government obtains encrypted data, inability to access decryption keys (held in adequate jurisdiction Canada) renders data cryptographically protected
- Residual Risk Assessment: LOW
- Encrypted data inaccessible without Canadian-held keys
- Pseudonymized AI training data not re-identifiable without Canadian database access
- Business context (B2B SaaS, LinkedIn marketing automation) outside national security targeting scope
- Zero government access requests to date (2022-present)
- EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 Compliance:
- Supplementary measures aligned with EDPB guidance on encryption at rest/in transit, pseudonymization, and key segregation (keys held in EU/adequate jurisdictions)
- Case-by-case assessment conducted specific to Clients.ai data types, sub-processors, and use cases
- Schrems II CJEU Compliance Conclusion:
- Transfers to USA sub-processors lawful under Standard Contractual Clauses + supplementary measures
- Supplementary measures provide level of protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed within EEA, consistent with Schrems II requirements (Case C-311/18)
- TIA documentation demonstrates compliance with data exporter obligation to verify appropriate safeguards (GDPR Article 46)
Full TIA Report Availability: The complete Transfer Impact Assessment (including detailed legal analysis, technical specifications, and risk scoring methodology) is available upon request to:
- EU/UK supervisory authorities conducting investigations or audits
- Enterprise customers with legitimate compliance needs (e.g., DPO review, procurement due diligence, internal audit)
- Data subjects exercising GDPR rights to information about safeguards (Article 15(2))
Contact: compliance@Clients.ai with justification and intended use of TIA report
Additional Transfer Mechanisms and Adequacy Decisions
Other Legal Bases for International Transfers
- UK International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA):
UK Information Commissioner's Office International Data Transfer Agreement (or UK Addendum to EU SCCs) executed for all UK personal data transfers to third countries, ensuring post-Brexit UK GDPR compliance. Applied to same sub-processors and transfer scenarios as EU SCCs. - Explicit Consent (GDPR Article 49(1)(a)):
Your explicit consent for specific transfers where required, provided by accepting the Terms of Service for transfers described therein. Note: Explicit consent is a subsidiary transfer mechanism, not the primary legal basis (SCCs remain primary mechanism). - Adequacy Decisions Leveraged:
- Canada: Commission Decision 2002/2/EC recognizes Canada's Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) as providing adequate protection for personal data transferred from the EEA to Canadian commercial organizations. KC Meta Ventures, Inc. is a Canadian commercial organization subject to PIPEDA, providing adequacy basis for EEA → Canada transfers without additional safeguards required.
- Japan: Commission Decision (EU) 2019/419 recognizes Japan's Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) as providing adequate protection for transfers to APPI-compliant entities
- UK: UK GDPR adequacy decision (2021) allows free flow of data between EEA and UK
- Canada-Specific Adequacy Note:
The European Commission's adequacy decision for Canada (2002/2/EC) applies specifically to commercial organizations subject to PIPEDA (not public sector entities subject to provincial privacy acts). KC Meta Ventures, Inc., as an Ontario-incorporated commercial entity engaging in commercial activities, falls squarely within PIPEDA's scope and thus benefits from the adequacy decision. This allows data to flow freely from EEA to Clients.ai's Canadian operations without requiring SCCs or other Article 46 safeguards.
Questions and Further Information
If you have questions about international data transfers, the safeguards we implement, or wish to request additional documentation (signed SCCs, full TIA report, sub-processor agreements), please contact:
KC Meta Ventures, Inc.
141 Sandwich Street North
Amherstburg, Ontario, N9V 2V1
Canada
Email: legal@clients.ai (legal inquiries, SCC requests)
Compliance: compliance@Clients.ai (TIA requests, DPO inquiries, supervisory authority correspondence)
Related Documents:
• Terms of Service - Section 17.6 (Data Processing Addendum)
• Privacy Policy - Section 6 (International Data Transfers)
• Security Policy - Technical and Organizational Measures
• Sub-Processors List
• Transparency Report - Government Access Requests
